Teachers’ reflections on mathematics teaching practices in a vulnerable context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33837/msj.v3i2.1204

Keywords:

Teaching practices, mathematics, reflection, vulnerable context, Higher Secondary Education

Abstract

The objective of this research is to show the difficulties and the challenges identified by teachers in their mathematics teaching practices. The research is based on the concept of reflection-action, thus a workshop-course centered on collaborative work and on reflections about teaching practices was designed in order to achieve the objective. Ten mathematics teachers the Telebachillerato (Higher Secondary Education Subsystem, Mexico) participated in this research. The results show that teachers have a variety of challenges, but also difficulties, particularly involving getting students to construct knowledge autonomously, as well as teachers selecting and using resources in accordance to the subject matter to be taught. In addition, there is also lack of mathematical and pedagogical knowledge in the participants. Collaborative work is required, leading teachers towards building the necessary knowledge for Higher Secondary Education in order to avoid student obstacles.

Author Biographies

David Alfonso Páez, CONACYT-Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes

Catedrático CONACyT-Departamento de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes

Daniel Eudave Muñoz, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes

Departamento de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, profesor-investigador

Teresa de Jesús Cañedo Ortiz, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes

Departamento de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, profesora-investigadora

Ana Cecilia Macías Esparza, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes

Departamento de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, profesora-investigadora

References

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: from a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89-106. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00040-8

Escalante, C. C. (2010). La formación de profesores de matemáticas: el caso del nivel medio superior. In L. A. Sepúlveda, P. R. García, T. L. M. Santos, M. F. Barrera, & R. A. Sánchez, (Eds.), Memorias del XVIII Encuentro de Profesores de Matemáticas. Morelia: UMSNH.

García, B. (2003). La evaluación de la docencia en el nivel universitario: implicaciones de las investigaciones acerca del pensamiento y la práctica docentes. Revista de la Educación Superior, 32(127), 63-70.

García, M., Sánchez, V., & Escudero I. (2006). Learning through reflection in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-9021-9.

Gilbert, J. (1994). The construction and reconstruction of the concept of the reflective practitioner in the discourses of teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 16(5), 511-522. doi: 10.1080/0950069940160503

Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2012). From text to ‘lived resources’: curriculum material and mathematics teacher development. New York: Springer.

Guzmán, I., Marín, R., & Inciarte, A. (2004). Innovar para transformar la docencia universitaria. Caracas: Astro.

Guzmán, M. L. (2001). Formación, concepciones y práctica de los profesores de matemáticas. Educación Matemática, 13(3), 93-106.

Hill, H., Sleep, L., Lewis, J., & Ball, D. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111-155). USA: Information Age.

Instituto Nacional de Evaluación para la Educación (INEE). (2015). Un panorama educativo de México 2014. Mexico, DF: INEE. Retrieved from http://publicaciones.inee.edu.mx/buscadorPub/P1/B/113/P1B113.pdf

Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211. doi: 10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z

Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (2008). The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional. New Zeland: Sense Publishers.

Kieran, C., Tanguay, D., & Solares, A. (2011). Teachers participating in a research project on learning: the spontaneous shaping of researcher-designed resources within classroom teaching practice. In Ubuz, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the PME (Vol. 3, pp. 81-88). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

Martínez-Rizo, F. (2013). Dificultades para implementar la evaluación formativa: revisión de literatura. Perfiles Educativos, 35(139), 128-150.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. USA: SAGE.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. USA: NCTM.

Páez, D.-A., Ramírez, M. M., Cañedo, T. de J., Eudave-Muñoz, D., Carvajal-Ciprés, M., & Macías-Esparza, A. C. (2019). Enseñar matemáticas en contexto vulnerable: retos y dificultades del profesor de Telebachillerato. In A. P. Costa, S. O. Sá, P. Castro & D. N. Souza (Eds.), Atas do 8º Congresso Ibero-Americano em Investigação Qualitativa (Vol. 1, pp. 827-836). Aveiro, Portugal: Ludomedia. Retrieved from https://proceedings.ciaiq.org/index.php/CIAIQ2019/article/view/2294/2213

Rogalski, J. (2003). Y a-t-il un pilote dans la classe? Une analyse de l’activité de l´enseignant comme gestion d’un environnement dynamique ouvert. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 23, 343-388.

Schoenfeld, A. (2007). Method. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on the mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69-109). USA: Information Age.

Schoenfeld, A. (2008). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 467-519). USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sfard, A. (2005). What could be more practical than good research? On mutual relations between research and practice of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 393-413. doi: 10.1007/s10649-005-4818-5.

Subsecretaría de Educación Media Superior (SEMS). (2015). Documento base. Telebachillerato Comunitario. Mexico: SEMS.

Weiss, H. E. (2017). Estudio exploratorio de Modelo de Telebachillerato Comunitario y su operación en los estados. Mexico: INEE.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-22

How to Cite

Páez, D. A., Eudave Muñoz, D., Cañedo Ortiz, T. de J., & Macías Esparza, A. C. (2020). Teachers’ reflections on mathematics teaching practices in a vulnerable context. Multi-Science Journal, 3(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.33837/msj.v3i2.1204